RetirementCheck101 logo A Service of RiskCheck101.comRetirementCheck101
Educational content only — not investment, tax, or legal advice. Based on publicly available IRS rules as of 2025. Disclaimer.

Trusts as IRA Beneficiaries: See-Through Rules and the 10-Year Trap

Estate PlanningUpdated 2025-06-18

Naming a trust as the beneficiary of an IRA is sometimes the only way to control distributions to a minor, a spendthrift heir, or a beneficiary with special needs. It is also one of the most common drafting failures in estate planning. A trust that does not qualify as a "see-through" trust under Treasury Regulation §1.401(a)(9)-4 forces the IRA into a five-year payout. A see-through trust that qualifies as a "conduit" trust under SECURE Act §401 may force the entire IRA out within ten years regardless of the trust's distribution provisions. The drafting tolerance is unforgiving.

The see-through requirements

Treas. Reg. §1.401(a)(9)-4(f)(2), finalized July 2024, requires a trust to satisfy four conditions to look through to its beneficiaries for §401(a)(9) purposes:

  1. The trust is valid under state law (or would be but for the lack of a corpus).
  2. The trust is irrevocable, or becomes irrevocable upon the death of the IRA owner.
  3. The beneficiaries are identifiable from the trust instrument.
  4. Required documentation is provided to the IRA custodian by October 31 of the year following the owner's death.

A trust meeting these requirements is a "see-through" trust. Its underlying beneficiaries are then treated as the designated beneficiaries of the IRA for RMD purposes.

Conduit vs accumulation trusts

The post-SECURE payout categories

For deaths after December 31, 2019, §401(a)(9)(H) divides designated beneficiaries into:

Worked example: the special-needs accumulation trust

A 70-year-old IRA owner names an accumulation trust as beneficiary. Primary lifetime beneficiary: a disabled adult daughter. Remainder beneficiary on the daughter's death: a charity. The trust qualifies as a see-through trust and meets the "applicable multi-beneficiary trust" rules under §401(a)(9)(H)(iv): the disabled daughter is treated as the sole designated beneficiary. Result: life-expectancy stretch using the daughter's age, not the charity's status.

If the same trust instead named the daughter's siblings (non-disabled) as remainder beneficiaries, the trust would lose the §(H)(iv) exception, and because one of the countable beneficiaries is not an EDB the 10-year rule applies. The disabled daughter would lose her stretch.

Common mistakes

Sources

If a trust appears anywhere in your beneficiary chain, the drafting deserves a second look. Explore the free educational tool.